The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict

The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict

  • Downloads:6186
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-09-21 00:19:06
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Elbridge A. Colby
  • ISBN:0300256434
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

Why and how America’s defense strategy must change in light of China’s power and ambition

“This is a realist’s book, laser-focused on China’s bid for mastery in Asia as the 21st century’s most important threat。”—Ross Douthat, New York Times

Elbridge A。 Colby was the lead architect of the 2018 National Defense Strategy, the most significant revision of U。S。 defense strategy in a generation。 Here he lays out how America’s defense must change to address China’s growing power and ambition。 Based firmly in the realist tradition but deeply engaged in current policy, this book offers a clear framework for what America’s goals in confronting China must be, how its military strategy must change, and how it must prioritize these goals over its lesser interests。
 
The most informed and in‑depth reappraisal of America’s defense strategy in decades, this book outlines a rigorous but practical approach, showing how the United States can prepare to win a war with China that we cannot afford to lose—precisely in order to deter that war from happening。

Download

Reviews

Chee Hau

I am really upset with this book。 We are in the 21st century but here we are beating the drums of war。 This book is firmly planted in US’ self interest and western perspective。 I find this book isfundamentally flawed。 First, the argument that the reunification of Taiwan as a mythical origin is a very simplistic view to justify war。 Let’s switch it a little。 If China is ruled by a democratic government and Taiwan on the other hand, is ruled by the communist, would you not think that China will st I am really upset with this book。 We are in the 21st century but here we are beating the drums of war。 This book is firmly planted in US’ self interest and western perspective。 I find this book isfundamentally flawed。 First, the argument that the reunification of Taiwan as a mythical origin is a very simplistic view to justify war。 Let’s switch it a little。 If China is ruled by a democratic government and Taiwan on the other hand, is ruled by the communist, would you not think that China will still be threatening to invade Taiwan if it declares independence? The Chinese and in general for all other nations, what is once part of a nation will forever be part of that nation。 To declare independence amounts to seceding。 If California would like to form a nationhood, why does the US constitution forbids it? And if they did, would US go to war? Why? After all, isn’t it just a mythical dream of a united America?The second flawed thinking is the view that democracy in Taiwan is China’s problem。 Do you think for a second that if Taiwan is another communist state or authoritarian leader, they will cozy up and reunify? Democracy is not the issue here。 This issue has a long historical baggage and this book has totally not done any justice to it。 It is my believe that the Chinese people view the land and people that live in all of China as part of one nationhood going back millennium and to be together is to be stronger。 Stronger not to bully but stronger so as not to be bullied。 Why you may ask。 Well, I think the humiliation of World War 2 has not exactly healed especially when your country has been carved up by foreign powers as they see fit。 If this were to happen to your country, what would you be feeling? It was many years ago but why is the wound still raw? It is because the aggressors have not been fully taken to justice unlike Germany and the Holocaust。 It is a US legacy issue of taking care of their own interest with regards to Japan and this has ultimately left a gaping wound。 Since that time, China has viewed the world on the prism of ‘no one will help you and no one has your interest at heart if you do not help yourself’。 There needs to be less of this type of books and rhetoric and more understanding。 。。。more

Peter Tillman

WSJ's take is that China's challenge to the US in Asia is likely to be a full-scale invasion of Taiwan:https://www。wsj。com/articles/the-stra。。。(Paywalled。 As always, I'm happy to email a copy to non-subscribers) Excerpt:"Mr。 Colby makes a persuasive case that if the U。S。 does not rapidly address its military shortfalls, China can successfully invade and occupy the neighboring island。 An invasion is Beijing’s “best strategy”—better than a lower-intensity military campaign, which would likely fail WSJ's take is that China's challenge to the US in Asia is likely to be a full-scale invasion of Taiwan:https://www。wsj。com/articles/the-stra。。。(Paywalled。 As always, I'm happy to email a copy to non-subscribers) Excerpt:"Mr。 Colby makes a persuasive case that if the U。S。 does not rapidly address its military shortfalls, China can successfully invade and occupy the neighboring island。 An invasion is Beijing’s “best strategy”—better than a lower-intensity military campaign, which would likely fail。 Mr。 Colby marshals an impressive command of military history to explain why Beijing will need to occupy the island to achieve its goals and how such an invasion might be conducted。 It is particularly significant that Mr。 Colby, a former Department of Defense official, details how the U。S。 and Taiwan could prevail in such a conflict while avoiding nuclear catastrophe。 "I'm sure the Taiwanese are reading this book, and worried about whether Pres。 Biden would really stand up to the PRC if/when they invade。 Which would logically happen on Biden's watch, after he's been humiliated in Kabul。 I'll be reading it。 And worrying, too。 I'm sure Taiwan's govt is thinking hard about building nuclear arms for themselves。 Which would give even the Red Army pause! If Pakistan and North Korea can become nuclear powers in a very few years (as they both did) -- how long could it take a technically-advanced nation to meet & exceed their armaments? No nuclear-armed state has ever attacked another (yet)。 Likely even Chairman Xi and his minions would not relish becoming (in Tom Lehrer's immortal words) french-fried potatoes, "All suffused with an incandescent glow"。。。。 Credible deterrence is by far the best way to avoid armed combat! 。。。more